# Iteration Peer and Peer Review

## Instructions

> This is a text based form that allows you to provide an easily analyzable
> data on how you feel that you and your teammates are doing on the project
> at this point. The form should be easy to fill out and provides evidence
> that can help me understand specific problem areas for groups and how to
> best remediate problems.
> 
> In some places, the form will indicate that you should enter text with
>   << TEXT YOU SHOULD ENTER >>
> In those locations, replace the text between and including the angle brackets
> with the specified text. for instance, I would replace
>   << SFU user ID >>
> with the text
>   wsumner
>
> In other places, the form will ask you to provide a ranking by deleting the
> rankings that do not apply. For instance, I make ask how well you agree with
> a statement on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongley agree).
> For instance, you may see:
>   Agreement: 1 2 3 4 5
> In such a case, delete the responsese you disagree with. For instance, if I
> stongly disagree, I would leave this text as:
>   Agreement: 1
>
> Similar rankings may occur for other issues in the form, as well.


## Overall Team Process

> Please rank how much you agree with the following statements.
> 1 (strongly disagree) -- 5 (strongly agree)

> Overall 1)
> Work was divided fairly and reasonably.
Agreement: 1 2 3 4 5

> Overall 2)
> The team developed a design based on the known requirements of the project.
Agreement: 1 2 3 4 5

> Overall 3)
> The team developed goals based on the known requirements of the project.
Agreement: 1 2 3 4 5

> Overall 4)
> The team achieved the goals set out for this iteration.
Agreement: 1 2 3 4 5


## Individual Contributions

> Next, rank yourself and each of your teammates for:
> technical skill, productivity, team work, and communication
> 1 (poor) -- 3 (good)
>
> The SFU user IDs of your team members are available within the team memebers
> section of GitLab if you do not already know their SFU user IDs.


> Team Member 1
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 2
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 3
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 4
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 5
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 6
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 7
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3

> Team Member 8
SFU user ID: << SFU user ID >>
technical:     1 2 3
productivity:  1 2 3
team work:     1 2 3
communication: 1 2 3


## Free Form Comments

> What went well?

<< Place any comments on what went well here. >>

> What went poorly?

<< Place any comments on what went poorly here. >>

> Are there any other issues you have encountered or comments that you have so far?

<< Place any other comments here. >>